Italy is falling  and I’m riding it upside down

archives \ about / contact \ code / le penne altrui


< previously: I dreamed I was a... // following: fears, etc. >
 

February 13th 2007. in defense of commentators

Oh, I had my little share of moronic commentators (just one actually) who a while ago depressed me so much that I had to close down the blog. Actually that wasn't the real reason why I did it. Anyway the commentator really disturbed me and made me sad, so I can understand how Babsi can be frustrated by her commentators now and then. For example, I am frustrated that I don't get that many comments. Aside of the two or three sweet souls that drop their lines not dreading the void that surrounds them, usually it is pretty silent around here. I have no idea how certain bloggers must feel when they open their blogs in the morning to find tens and tens of new comments, all giving a new life to the recent posts. Must be great. Or not.

Babsi maintains that the comments she receives are often "off-topic, empty", and have no purpose ("they are an end in itself"). She wonders if her blog "really deserves the commentators it has." "I can't have a blog with comments that make me happy when I read them", she says. Then, quite incoherently, she mentions a number of commentators who write good comments that make her happy.
(So, Babsi, what's the deal?)

It is none of my business, but honestly, from the way she presents it, I don't really see what trouble Babsi has with her commentators. You're not and you can't be in control of what people comment on your blog. End of story. Is it really useful to inhibit your commentators by pointing out your discontent?

I think that when it comes to commentators you must appreciate what you are happy to have and don't bother with what you'd rather do without (or, like in my case, what you don't have). There is no other decent way around this: complaining out loud for "off-topic" comments is... well, what a teacher would do. A bad teacher at that. Sure, by doing so, that teacher could obtain more coherent papers from the pupils: but (I think we all remember this from school) certainly less spontaneous and original and authentic ones.
Anyway, the teacher can be excused for this choice because of the supposed pedagogic purposes. But a blog isn't school, right? What good all the rules can do here? Besides, what you write and what is commented are two very different things. I am not saying one can't be disappointed, or offended by a comment or another: and you can close everything down if you need it. But to what authority exactly can you complain for the "bad" comments? And what would be the charge? People not being what I expected them to be?

I don't know, maybe it is even unfair --or inelegant -- to put your commentators down, to demolish them, in such a general way from a post of your blog: since your commentators are there for you and for what you write and all they can do is to say what they think, while you get to decide and give the directions and make things happen.

Supposedly we all enjoy the freedom of the net (although, alas, it is pretty frequent in the italian blogland to find people complaining about it): well, these are its inconveniences. But they can't seriously harm you, because freedom works both ways. It sets you free, too.

To put an end to this post, I'll say that this story reminded me of that scene in a Milan Kundera's novel (I think it was Immortality) where a good looking girl in a salon in Paris gives her indignant speech about how dreadful it is to be an "object" of the attention of the men, and how horrible it is for a woman who walks down the streets to be whistled at, etc. Everyone in the salon agrees with the girl's indignant speech, because she is obviously right. Then someone, not an adept of social rules apparently, notes how not being an object of the attentions of anyone can also be terrible: maybe even ten times worse. Because not being desirable it is one of the outposts of solitude, and as such it should be kept in mind as a possibility (or better, as a probability), when we dismiss as wrong the attentions we receive.
I guess this is even truer when we talk about fame and respect and readership than when we talk about good looks, since nothing, not even immortality, lasts forever.


 
 

 

4 Responses to “in defense of commentators” :

Chiara said

It’s not always great to have many comments, corpodibacco!

Your daily reader,
C.

maateo said

I totally agree with you. (I have to say that I have the chance to read this post thanks to Babsi herself). I’m sort of involved in this debate, and your position is the one that fits mine better.
What about the challenge to “produce contents”, moved by Genna to all the potential commentators?
Thank you.

corpodibacco said

Chiara, you’re right of course. One always wants more readers, more acknowledgment, more blog fame… It is always out of some stupid frustration. But I know I am read… And I am glad of what I have. Amazed, sometimes.

maateo: …I never read Genna’s blog… but I read the post you talk about. I totally disliked it. Patronizing and bossy. And really exaggerated. He wants us not to do this way, he wants us to do the other way… typical italian famous blogger. He seems convinced that the simple fact of deciding to have a role as “the one who writes the posts” vs. “the one who writes comments” makes you special. What an ass. The point is not “creating content”. It all depends on the quality of the content you create. Or the honesty of it. And if your posts are dishonest, they can still give you many readers and many comments. Or not. So what that proves? Nothing. If you’re dishonest you can get a lot of pointless comments that sneer at you. In that case the comments are probably better than the content. (Comments are a different kind of content too, so the whole pretext is stupid anyway.)
I think he’s putting those who provide content on a pedestal only because he’s one of them.
And he compares writing comments to vomiting! He can go to hell as far as I’m concerned.
And anyway. Nobody seems to conceive spontaneity as something more than anarchy to be regulated. That’s so wrong. The way I see it, spontaneity is the only decent fertile common ground we should try to preserve, and let be. Montessori wasn’t on the mille lire for nothing.

Giorgio said

maybe Babsi just miss a commentator like me: witty, brilliant, polyglottical … things like that.

Leave a Reply :


Italy is falling is an italian blog in english language // not entirely irresponsible // it was born on the first of july 2005 // it is based on wordpress // it is ad-free // it resisted 47,484 spamming attempts // template, graphics and content are © italyisfalling.com 2008 according to this creative commons license // all is made with ~love