February 16th 2007. Taking from Amarilli >
One's real reaction to a book, when one has a reaction at all, is usually, 'I like this book' or 'I don't like it', and what follows is a rationalization. But 'I like this book' is not, I think, a non-literary reaction; the non literary reaction is 'This book is on my side, and therefore I must discover merits in it.'
-- George Orwell, Writers and Leviathan, 1948
If you google Amarilli Caprio today, you can find a lot of new interesting and ridiculous stuff. The most surprising of all items is undoubtedly the one on the website of left-wing magazine il Diario, where is reproduced Amarilli's poem (about which I wrote the other day). What's surprising is that not only Amarilli's poem is reported as it is, and linked from the top of the home page, like it was a regular contribution to the magazine: as you can see in the picture, they also suggest to their readers to buy the anthology from which the poem is taken, and that's about all the comment they give to it.
Haven't they noticed that Amarilli's poem is, well, corny and, to put it bluntly, kind of sucks? I don't know, maybe the criteria to decide when a poem sucks are lost. And maybe it's a good thing.
Still. I've been saying myself that Amarilli Caprio, member of the Red Brigades and occasional poet, should be less obvious as a person because she writes poetry. But this doesn't make her poetry automatically interesting, right? Self standing? Only because she's a fucking terrorist?
And what about the good poets who aren't political activists, or criminals, or who don't have some other kind of equally unrelated quality about them?
I guess they're still expected to sign below the paper where on is indelibly printed "everything is politics": or some other similarly depressing indelible thought.
The Poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti has been arrested near Brescia, in Italy.